Protests against Elon Musk and Tesla have spread around the world thanks to CEO’s participation in Trump administration. Now these protests are listed as an official “risk factor” at Paperwork Tesla is obliged to deposit with federal regulators.
The new language, registered With the Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday morning, it shows that the reaction against Musk has increased to such a level that Tesla’s lawyers feel the need to warn investors, could harm the company’s brand and businesses.
While risk factors are usually written to be wide and overly careful, sometimes the inclusion of the new (or old) language can signal what issues or developments are more important for a company such as Tesla and, critical, its legal group.
For years, Tesla has included a risk factor that informs investors that “its products, businesses, work results and statements and actions of Tesla and its administration are subject to significant amounts of comments from a range of third parties”.
This risk factor warned this “criticism, which can be excessive or unfounded, such as speculation about the adequacy or stability of our management team” could “harm our business and make it more difficult to pump additional capital if needed” registered In January.
This language changed on Wednesday.
Tesla has informed the language of the risk factor to include criticism now “He has stated protests, some escalations in violence that targets our activities, products and staff”. Tesla’s lawyers have also expanded what is in danger, saying negative perceptions arising from protests, along with the broader criticism of the company, “can harm our trademark and business (including sales) and make it more difficult to concentrate”.
Despite the consequences of Tesla in the new language, there is no known relationship between global protests against the company and isolated vandalism actions against exhibitions and turbocharger stations. (Musk went even more on Tuesday, arguing that Tesla’s quarterly profits calls that protesters are “paid” without offering any kind of evidence.)
It was already obvious that the actions of Musk may hurt Tesla. What was difficult to analyze is how much damage the protests do.
The financial results of Tesla released on Tuesday showed such a strong decline in the automotive and profit on an annual basis that it made it clear. Musk and other Tesla executives on the call also admitted that the protests created “negative effects”.
But Wednesday’s deposition of SEC offers a clearer answer in some ways: the protests are important enough for Tesla lawyers to recognize them in writing.
A spokesman for Tesla Takedown, who helped organize protests in cities around the world, celebrated the integration of the company’s risk factors.
“We could not ask for a better approval of our movement than Tesla who officially calls us as a risk factor. When the truth becomes threatened, you know that you have an impact,” they said in an online statement on TechCrunch. “Tesla Takedown’s enormous success has created a powerful platform for a wider impact.”
