Close Menu
TechTost
  • AI
  • Apps
  • Crypto
  • Fintech
  • Hardware
  • Media & Entertainment
  • Security
  • Startups
  • Transportation
  • Venture
  • Recommended Essentials
What's Hot

Indonesia ‘conditionally’ lifts Grok ban

Apple tells Patreon to move creators to in-app purchases for subscriptions by November

India offers zero taxes till 2047 to attract global AI workloads

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
TechTost
Subscribe Now
  • AI

    Indonesia ‘conditionally’ lifts Grok ban

    1 February 2026

    OpenClaw’s AI assistants are now building their own social network

    1 February 2026

    Nvidia CEO refutes report that his company’s $100 billion OpenAI investment has stalled

    31 January 2026

    A look at Physical Intelligence, the startup building Silicon Valley’s busiest robot brains

    31 January 2026

    Anthropic brings agent plug-ins to Cowork

    30 January 2026
  • Apps

    Apple tells Patreon to move creators to in-app purchases for subscriptions by November

    1 February 2026

    Chrome takes on AI browsers with tighter Gemini integration, agent-like features for autonomous tasks

    1 February 2026

    WhatsApp will now charge for AI chatbots to operate in Italy

    31 January 2026

    Bluesky issues its first transparency report, noting an increase in user reports and legal requirements

    31 January 2026

    Instagram may soon let you remove yourself from someone’s close friends list

    30 January 2026
  • Crypto

    Hackers stole over $2.7 billion in crypto in 2025, data shows

    23 December 2025

    New report examines how David Sachs may benefit from Trump administration role

    1 December 2025

    Why Benchmark Made a Rare Crypto Bet on Trading App Fomo, with $17M Series A

    6 November 2025

    Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko is a big fan of agentic coding

    30 October 2025

    MoviePass opens Mogul fantasy league game to the public

    29 October 2025
  • Fintech

    How Sequoia-backed Ethos went public while rivals lagged behind

    30 January 2026

    5 days left for TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 +1 pass with 50%

    26 January 2026

    50% off +1 ends | TechCrunch

    23 January 2026

    Capital One acquires Brex for a steep discount to its valuation, but early believers are laughing all the way to the bank

    23 January 2026

    Tiger Global and Microsoft will fully exit Walmart-backed PhonePe through its IPO

    22 January 2026
  • Hardware

    India offers zero taxes till 2047 to attract global AI workloads

    1 February 2026

    Microsoft won’t stop buying AI chips from Nvidia, AMD even after its own is released, says Nadella

    30 January 2026

    The iPhone just had its best quarter ever

    30 January 2026

    Snap is serious about specs, spinning off AR glasses into a standalone company

    28 January 2026

    Android phones are getting more anti-theft features

    27 January 2026
  • Media & Entertainment

    OnlyFans is considering selling a majority stake to Architect Capital

    31 January 2026

    Last 24 hours to get 50% off +1 pass for Disrupt 2026 | TechCrunch

    30 January 2026

    Disrupt 2026: +1 cards are almost gone with only 3 days left

    28 January 2026

    Sci-fi writers, Comic-Con say goodbye to artificial intelligence

    26 January 2026

    Amagi debuts in India as cloud TV software company tests investor appetite

    24 January 2026
  • Security

    Russian hackers breached Poland’s power grid thanks to poor security, report says

    31 January 2026

    Whistleblower Told FBI Jeffrey Epstein Had ‘Personal Hacker’

    31 January 2026

    Fintech firm Marquis blames hack on firewall provider SonicWall for data breach

    30 January 2026

    Apple’s new iPhone and iPad security feature restricts mobile networks from collecting accurate location data

    29 January 2026

    If you live in the UK, you will probably no longer be able to visit Pornhub

    29 January 2026
  • Startups

    Meet the new European unicorns of 2026

    1 February 2026

    HomeBoost’s app will show you where you can save money on your utility bills

    1 February 2026

    Qualcomm backs SpotDraft to scale AI with on-device deal doubling valuation to $400 million

    31 January 2026

    Redwood Lands Google for $425M Series E as AI Power Needs Grow

    31 January 2026

    Tiny startup Arcee AI built a 400B parameter open source LLM from scratch to best Meta’s Llama

    30 January 2026
  • Transportation

    Luminar sale approved despite last-minute mystery bid

    1 February 2026

    Tesla profits down 46% in 2025

    1 February 2026

    Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

    31 January 2026

    Tesla’s energy storage business is growing faster than any other part of the company

    30 January 2026

    Waymo robotaxis now offers rides to and from San Francisco International Airport

    30 January 2026
  • Venture

    a16z contributor Kofi Ampadu will be leaving permanently after the TxO program is discontinued

    31 January 2026

    Reid Hoffman urges Silicon Valley leaders to stop bending the knee to President Trump

    31 January 2026

    VC 2150 raises €210 million to solve cities’ climate challenges

    27 January 2026

    Obvious Ventures lands fund five with a 360-degree view of planetary, human and financial health

    27 January 2026

    Vinod Khosla publicly disavows Keith Rabois’ comments on ICE shooting

    26 January 2026
  • Recommended Essentials
TechTost
You are at:Home»Startups»DNA companies should be given the death penalty for hacking
Startups

DNA companies should be given the death penalty for hacking

techtost.comBy techtost.com8 December 202304 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Dna Companies Should Be Given The Death Penalty For Hacking
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

DNA companies should be given the death penalty for hacking

Personal data is the new gold. The recent 23andMe data breach is a stark reminder of a chilling reality – our most intimate, personal information may not be as secure as we think. It’s a damning indictment of the sheer negligence of companies that, while profiting from our DNA, fail to protect it.

The 23andMe breach led to hackers gaining access to 6.9 million users’ personal information, including family trees, birth years and geographic locations. It brings up some important questions: Are companies really doing enough to protect our data? Should we trust them with our most personal information?

Companies promise to keep our data safe, but there are a few quirks here. Government overreach is certainly a possibility, as the FBI and every law enforcement agency in the world probably cringes at the thought of accessing such a massive DNA sequence data set. It could be a gold mine for every cold case from here to the south pole.

The argument “But if you haven’t done anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about!” only partially true, here: The problem is a consensus problem. At one point my father took a DNA test and found out he had a half-brother who is about to turn 80. It got an incredible family drama when they started digging into the history and discovered a whole bunch of potentially problematic family history.

The problem isn’t so much that my father chose to do this, it’s that I didn’t consent to being in a database, and that’s where things get stuck. I can envision a definite Black Mirror-like future where a family member is curious about their parentage, gets tested, and two weeks later, the FBI is knocking on the door of every person who shares 50% DNA with that person because they’re wanted for some kind of crime.

The audacity of 23andMe, and companies like it, is amazing. They position themselves as guardians of our genetic history, guardians of our ancestral past and possible medical future. But when the chips are down and our data is compromised, they hide behind the old “we weren’t hacked. it was the users old passwords” excuse.

This logic is the equivalent of a bank saying, “It’s not our fault your money was stolen. you should have had a better lock on your front door.’ It is unacceptable and a blatant disclaimer.

Companies dealing with such sensitive data should be held to the highest possible standards. We’re not just talking about credit card numbers or email addresses here. This is our DNA, the very blueprint of our existence. If anything should be considered “sacred” in the digital realm, surely this should be it?

The fact that the stolen data was touted as a list of people with backgrounds who have been victims of systemic discrimination in the past adds another troubling layer to this debacle. It highlights the potential for such data to be misused in the most obscene ways, including targeted attacks and discrimination.

The DNA testing industry needs to be strengthened. It must ensure that the security measures in place are not just adequate, but extraordinary. They should lead the way in cyber security, setting the example for all other industries to follow.

It’s not just about better passwords or two-factor authentication. This is a fundamental change in the way these companies view the data entrusted to them. It is about recognizing the deep responsibility they have, not only towards their customers, but also to society in general.

I am optimistic; Not even a little. I have long argued that after the Equifax breach, the company should have received the corporate equivalent of the death penalty. Instead, she was fined $700 million. I think it’s funny. Allowing a breach of this magnitude to even be possible, does it really matter if it happens? You don’t deserve to keep being friends. I think this is even more true for companies that deal with our DNA.

It’s time for 23andMe and the DNA testing industry as a whole to realize that they’re not just in the data business. They deal with people’s lives, their stories and their futures. It’s time they start treating our data with the respect and care it deserves.

Companies death DNA Exclusive Hacking India OpenAI penalty Rishi Jaitly
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous Article‘Secondaries summer’ is over, but 2024 looks promising
Next Article Former Uber CSO Joe Sullivan explains why he ‘had to get over’ the shock of his data breach conviction
bhanuprakash.cg
techtost.com
  • Website

Related Posts

India offers zero taxes till 2047 to attract global AI workloads

1 February 2026

Meet the new European unicorns of 2026

1 February 2026

Luminar sale approved despite last-minute mystery bid

1 February 2026
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss

Indonesia ‘conditionally’ lifts Grok ban

1 February 2026

Apple tells Patreon to move creators to in-app purchases for subscriptions by November

1 February 2026

India offers zero taxes till 2047 to attract global AI workloads

1 February 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Fintech

How Sequoia-backed Ethos went public while rivals lagged behind

30 January 2026

5 days left for TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 +1 pass with 50%

26 January 2026

50% off +1 ends | TechCrunch

23 January 2026
Startups

Meet the new European unicorns of 2026

HomeBoost’s app will show you where you can save money on your utility bills

Qualcomm backs SpotDraft to scale AI with on-device deal doubling valuation to $400 million

© 2026 TechTost. All Rights Reserved
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Disclaimer

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.