It was only a day since Chatgpt’s new AI image generator went live and social media foods have already been flooded with Mimids created by AI in Studio Ghibli style, the worship Japanese cartoon studio behind films such as “My Neighboro” and “My Neighboro”.
In the last 24 hours, we have seen images created by AI representing the versions of his Ghibli studio Elon Musk”The lord of the rings‘, And President Donald Trump. Openai Sam Altman’s chief executive seems to have made his new profile picture a picture of Ghibli studioProbably made by the GPT-4O image generator. Users seem to upload existing images and images in the chatgpt and ask Chatbot to re -create it in new style.
The latest update of OpenAI comes to Google’s release heels from a similar AI image feature on the Flash Gemini model, which also caused a viral moment earlier in March, when people used it to remove watercolors from images.
The latest tools of Openai and Google facilitate the re-creation of the forms of copyright-protected works-simply typing a text exhortation. Together, these new AI image features seem to rejuvenate concerns at the core of many conductors against AI model genetic developers. If these companies are trained in copyright -protected projects, do they violate copyright law?
According to Evan Brown, a copyright lawyer at the Neal & McDevitt law firm, products such as GPT-4O image generator, operate in a legal gray area today. The style is not explicitly protected by copyright, according to Brown, which means that Openai does not seem to violate the law simply by creating images that look like Studio Ghibli films.
However, Brown says it is reasonable that Openai has achieved this resemblance by training his model in millions of contexts from Ghibli’s films. Even if this were the case, many courts are still deciding whether AI models training in copyright -protected projects falls under fair protection.
“I think this raises the same question that we have wondered for a few years now,” Brown said in an interview. “What are the consequences of infringement of the copyright of the exit. Tissue detection and copying in these databases?”
The New York Times and several publishers are in active lawsuits against Openai, arguing that the company trains AI models in copyright -protected projects without proper performance or payment. There have been similar claims that have suffered lawsuits against other leading AI companies, including Meta and AI’s Metjourney Metjourney.
In a statement to TechCrunch, an Openai spokesman says that while Chatgpt refuses to reproduce “the style of individual artists”, Openai allows him to reproduce “broader studio style”. Of course, it is worth noting that there are live artists who are credited with pioneering studio style, such as the co -founder of Studio Ghibli, Hayao Miyazaki.
Obviously, users also have the ability to use the natural function of the GPT-4O to re-create style from other studios and artists. Someone else made a portrait of Marc Andreessen in the style of Dr. Seussand a married couple re -created Wedding photos with Pixar style.
We have tried several popular AI image generators – including those available at Google’s Gemini, Xai’s Grok and Playground.ai – to see their ability to match the style of the studio Ghibli. We found the new Openai image generator created the most expensive copy of the style of the cartoon studio.
For the time being, the new features of Openai and Google’s Google are a jump forward to what they can create AI models, which seems to lead to an increase in use. Openai delayed the development of the new image tool for free -level users on Wednesday, reporting high demand. This may be the most important thing for these companies today, but we should wait for the courts to weigh for their legality.
