A mysterious London investor asked a bankruptcy judge in Delaware to stop selling Ev Startup Canoo’s assets to his CEO, calling the “wrong” process.
Charles Garson, a UK -based investor with no obvious ties with EV startup, offered $ 20 million to Canoo’s assets, According to a deposit. A lawyer who represents Garson made a proposal on Friday to abandon the sale, claiming that he presented a “much higher bid” to Canoo Ceo Anthony Aquila, who offered just $ 4 million in cash. (Aquila’s offer also includes the extinguishing of about $ 11 million on Canoo loans owes its own financial company.)
Garson is said to have been told by the bankruptcy manager that his offer would be examined and had until about the end of April to complete the details, according to the deposit. Two days after Garson’s claim that he was told, the administrator “proceeded with the sale of sale” and closed the sale of Canoo assets to Aquila. The sale finally closed on April 11. The bankruptcy manager did not respond to a request for comments.
Garson is not alone to protest for sale. Harbinger Motors, an EV truck boot created by a number of former Canoo officials, opposed the sale before it was finalized. The bankruptcy judge overturned this objection. Harbinger appealed.
There is very few information available on Garson Online. LinkedIn’s profile says it is in London and is involved in real estate investment. He is referred to as the director of an investment company in real estate called Garland Holdings Limited in the United Kingdom, according to The Country of Business.
The void proposal does not explain why Garson is interested in Canoo or if other investors are involved. Garson provided a statement to support the pending proposal, which includes 23 exhibits. But all these documents were submitted under stamp. A lawyer for Garson did not immediately respond to a request for comments.
“[Garson] He believed he had more than enough time to submit his higher offer based on communications with the administrator and his adviser. By dependency on such communications, Movant did not oppose sell or officially
Submit a competitive bid while continuing to complete his offer and request clarification from the manager “according to the deposit.
“Despite the clearly superior bid that threw him practically, the administrator decided to seek court approval for a transaction” with Aquila, the deposition reports. A lawyer for Aquila did not respond to a request for comments.
So many eight parties signed Ndas and evaluated Canoo’s assets before the sale, a lawyer for bankruptcy began to reveal earlier this month. He said that only some of them came close to the bid, including a group that the bankruptcy manager said could raise concerns to the foreign investment committee in the United States due to the (unspecified) “foreign property”. It is not clear whether Garson’s offer is what the manager was referring to.
