Deel has filed a new volleyball in the ongoing legal battle with the opponent startup. Deel submitted a proposal containing a series of letters, asking the Irish court to make the ripple of information.
In one letter, Deel wants non -remodeled testimonies, including former employee Keith O’Brien. In a story full of turns that reads like a film, O’Brien admitted to an Irish court that he was a spy for the Deel, according to a corrugated statement.
Rippling filed a lawsuit against Deel in March, which supports the abuse of commercial secrets, aggressive intervention, unfair competition and much more, largely based on espionage claims.
Deel has since renamed, trying to reject the Rippling suit to a number of issues such as jurisdiction, but also to make its own allegations of ripple. Deel claims that, for example, that the wavy was also trying to spy on Deel.
In the letters released publicly on Monday, the Deel shows an affidavit by Vanessa Wu employee of the former Rippling Councilor. Much of the affidavit talked about what Wu reminded of alleged events related to the spy and the assumption of various letters sent between the lawyers on both sides.
But Deel points out that Wu also testified that the spot shot O’Brien and paid a finish end in return to sign a deal not to sue. Wu also filed, the affidavit said that the industry entered into a second agreement with O’Brien, where the industry “agreed to contribute to Mr O’Brien’s costs for these procedures and to pay the reasonable from the pocket and legal expenses in relation to the cooperation provided by this agreement.”
Deel wants a court to rush to convert full versions of both agreements. He wants to tell anyone who will hear how unusual it is that an employee who shot for the cause launches back into a company’s payroll as a paid witness.
Needless to say, both sides strongly proclaim their own innocence while showing their fingers to the other.
We need to wait and see what the court rules, but if it does more than O’Brien’s testimony and the finish deals available to the public, we will read.
