New York legislators Passed an account On Thursday, it aims to prevent AI Frontier models from Openai, Google and Anthropic from contributing to disaster scenarios, including the death or injury of more than 100 people or more than $ 1 billion in compensation.
The passage of the growth law represents a victory for the AI security movement, which has lost the ground in recent years, as Silicon Valley and Trump administration have prioritized speed and innovation. Security supporters, including Nobel Prize -winning Geoffrey Hinton and AI Research Pioneer Yoshua Bengio, have defended the Raise law. If the law is made, the bill would introduce the first set by America of the legal orders of transparency for Labs Frontier AI.
The law on the increase has some of the same provisions and objectives with the controversial California Security Bill, SB 1047, which eventually veto. However, co-athlete of the bill, a New York State Senator Andrew Gounardes, told TechCrunch in an interview that he deliberately designed the Raise act so as not to coolene the innovation between the newly established or academic researchers.
“The window to implement Guardrails is rapidly shrinking, given how quickly this technology is evolving,” said Senator Gounardes. ‘People who know [AI] The best says that these risks are incredibly likely […] This is worrying. ”
The law on growth is now headed to the office of New York Governor Kathy Hochul, where he could either sign the law to the law, send it back to modifications or veto it.
If the law signs, the New York Security Bill would require the largest AI laboratories in the world to publish thorough security and security reports on AI models. The bill also requires AI Labs reporting security incidents, such as the behavior of the AI model or bad actors who steal an AI model if they happen. If technology companies fail to respond to these standards, the RAISE law authorizes the New York Attorney General to bring in civil penalties of up to $ 30 million.
Raise law aims to closely regulate the world’s largest companies – either based in California (such as OpenAi and Google) or China (such as Deepseek and Alibaba). The bill’s transparency requirements apply to companies whose AI models have been trained using more than $ 100 million in computing resources (seemingly, more than any AI model available today) and are available to New York residents.
While similar to SB 1047 in some ways, the law on the increase was designed to cope with the criticism of previous AIs accounts, according to Nathan Calvin, the Vice President of State Affairs and the Encode General Advisor, who worked in this bill and SB 1047.
Nevertheless, Silicon Valley has prompted a major back into the New York Security Bill, New York and the co-sponsor of Actave Act Alex Bores, he told TechCrunch. The Bores called the industry resistance without surprise, but claimed that the law on the increase would not in any way limit the innovation of technology companies.
“The law on the growth of New York is still another stupid, stupid state AI bill that will only hurt the US at a time when our opponents are struggling forward,” said general associate Andreessen Horowitz Anjney Midha in a Friday Post in x. Andreessen Horowitz and Y Combinator boot boot were some of the most intense opponents on SB 1047.
Anthropogenic, AI Laboratory focused on Security Called for Federal Transparency StanDards for AI companies Earlier this month, he has not reached an official attitude for the bill, co -founder Jack Clark said in a Friday Post in x. However, Clark expressed some complaints about how wide the act is to increase, noting that he could present the risk of “smaller companies”.
When asked about Anthropic’s criticism, Senator Gounardes told TechCrunch that he thought he was “losing the signal”, noting that he planned the bill not to apply to small companies.
Openai, Google and Meta did not respond to TechCrunch’s request for comments.
Another joint criticism of the increase in growth is that AI model developers will simply not offer the most advanced AI models in New York. This was a similar criticism that dealt with SB 1047 and is largely what is played in Europe thanks to the harsh regulations of Epirus for technology.
AssemBlymember Bores told TechCrunch that the regulatory burden of the law on the increase is relatively light and therefore should not require technology companies to stop operating their products in New York. Since New York has the third largest GDP in the US, state removal is not something that most companies will get slightly.
“I don’t want to underestimate political microscopy that can happen, but I’m very sure there is no financial reason [AI companies] Not to make their models in New York, “AssemBlymember Bares said.
