Meta’s AI glasses have a growing reputation as a creepy technology. The company hopes to change that opinion by announcing an update that will disable the camera if the LED that indicates the glasses are recording has been tampered with.
The move is seemingly a concession consumer feeling that glasses are not just fun, trendy accessories that Kylie Jenner happily promotes, but have serious implications for consumers’ privacy: they can be used as surveillance devices.
But even as Meta is touting the new safeguard this week, the company is also pushing products and features that ask users to hand over more of their privacy to the company.
Whether that’s training its AI on your images, enabling AI features using your personal content unless you opt out, or exploring ways records continuously or use biometric facial recognitionMeta’s vision for the future seems to always hinge on collecting more of your personal data.
In this blog post about the camera’s new security feature, the company pats itself on the back, noting that “no other kind of camera has done this, and we’re proud to be leading the industry forward.” However, Meta also admits the move was necessary because some people were using tape to cover the LED, which had already forced Meta to adapt its technology to disable recording when the LED is blocked.
Once determined, these same AI glasses will then use “sophisticated efforts to modify or destroy the capture LED,” Meta’s announcement explains.
In other words, Meta confirms that some people using AI glasses have hidden agendas — that is, a desire to record situations or people (often women) without their consent.
Despite this, the company is reportedly testing a prototype AI glasses that “will continuously collect sound while taking photos every few seconds,” sources said recently. the Financial Times.
Meta’s blog post about the glasses includes attempts to assuage people’s fears about the privacy of the devices by answering questions like “who can see the photos and videos I take on my glasses?” Meta responds by promising, “You and only you — unless you choose to share them.” Meta’s though privacy policy he explained that any image you share with Meta AI can be used to train its AI.
All this time, the company faces multiple investigations and lawsuits for privacy violations of Meta AI glasses. One lawsuit comes after Meta specifically canceled a contract with an outsourced technology company after some of its Kenyan workers claimed they had to view graphic content such as sex, nudity and people using the toiletwhile training your Meta AI using the videos of people’s Meta AI glasses.
These aren’t Meta’s first breaches of privacy or security measures either.
Arguably, Meta’s reputation for privacy has been tarnished for years since numerous leaks and lost leads for the alleged lack of child safety measures and desire to grow at any cost. There are books by whistleblowers substantiating his claims abusesnot to mention previous large-scale privacy disasters like the Cambridge Analytica data scandal and others.
After the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2018, Meta is now sticking to it Privacy progress update page, “Since 2019, we have invested significantly in people, products and technology to continue to evolve our strong privacy program.”
However, the company is plowing through what many people would consider privacy-infringing ideas. Case in point: the same day he announced the new Meta glasses safeguard, he shared it Meta AI can now use anyone’s public Instagram photos to create artificial intelligence images, unless you opt out.
It also created features to use Meta AI on images in your Camera Roll that you’ve never shared, and implemented such poor privacy controls in the Meta AI app that users are essentially self-confident revealing their shameful pursuits.
This is the same company that Apple wouldn’t do business with due to privacy concerns, that records its employees’ keystrokes to train its AI, and that plans to sell targeted ads based on data in your AI conversations.
So while LED protection in AI glasses may be a must-have feature, consumers clearly have plenty of reason to remain skeptical of how social media will use their images and data, especially in broader AI designs.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This does not affect our editorial independence.
