Individuals, industrial groups and local governments have submitted more than 10,000 comments to the White House on National AI policy, also known as AI action plan. The White House Science and Technological Policy Office (OSTP) on Thursday published The text of pdf submissions extending to 18,480 pages.
Comments, which touch on the issues ranging from copyright to environmental damage to AI Data Centers, come as President Donald Trump and allies rejuvenate US government priorities.
In January, President Trump managed to abolish the executive mandate of former President Joe Biden, who had instructed the National Institute of Standards and Technology to create guidance that helps companies to identify – and correct – imperfections in models, including prejudices. Critics allied with Trump claimed that the ordering requirements of the order were burdened and effectively forced to disclose their commercial secrets.
Shortly after the AI executive mandate was revoked, Trump signed a mandate that directs federal services to promote the development of AI “free from ideological prejudice” that promotes “human boom, economic competitiveness and national security”. It is important that Trump’s order made no reference to the fight against AI discrimination, which was a basic principle of Biden’s initiative.
The comments submitted to the White House make it clear what is at stake in the AI race.
Some commentators have claimed that AI exploits, in a word, trained in creative works that are not compensated for their involuntary contributions and asked Trump’s administration to enhance the regulation of copyright. On the opposite side, commentators such as VC Andreessen Horowitz accused beneficiaries of placing the roads in the development of AI.
Several AI companies, including Google and Openai, have also pressed for friendly rules on AI training in previous comments on the AI Action Plan.
Reports from organizations, including Americans for prosperity, the future of life in the future of life, and the American Academy of Nursing, emphasized the importance of investment in research at a time when the federal government reduces scientific grants. Expert AI They have criticized the recent Trump administration cuts in the scientific grant, and in particular the reductions supported by the Department of Government Effectiveness of billionaire Elon Musk.
Some commentators on the AI Action Plan have been targeted by the extensive Trump administration invoices for foreign goods, suggesting that they may harm the AI domestic efforts. The Data Center Coalition, a trade union that represents the Data Center sector, states that invoices for infrastructure accessories “will limit and slow down” US AI investments. Elsewhere, the IT Council, a defense team whose members include Amazon, Intel and Microsoft, have urged “smart” invoices that “protect domestic industries without escalating the trade wars that harm consumers”.
Only a handful of comments that refer to “censorship AI”, a topic topic for many of Trump’s close confidential. Elon Musk and Crypto and Ai “Czar” David Sacks claimed that the popular Chatbots views, with bags distinguish Chatgpt especially as false for politically sensitive issues.
In fact, bias in AI is an intolerable technical problem. Musk’s Ai Company, Xai, has struggled to create a chatbot that does not support any political views on others.
President Trump has increased efforts to raise a AI policy in recent months.
In March, the Senate confirmed Trump’s choice for OSTP director Michael Kratsios, who focused on AI policy at Ostp during Trump’s first term. Towards the end of last year, Trump named the former VC Sriram Krishnan as a senior White House policy adviser for AI.
