In the battle between two “Agentic” coding tools – Claude Code by Anthropic and Codex Cli of Openai – the latter seems to cultivate more programmer than the first. This is at least partly because Anthropic has issued a notification of abolition to a developer trying to reverse the Claude Code, which is under a more restrictive license than the Codex Cli.
Claude Code and Codex Cli are duel tools that achieve much of the same thing: allow developers to make the power of AI models running in the cloud to complete various coding tasks. Anthropic and Openai released them within months from each other – each company is struggling to capture valuable Mindshare programmer.
The Codex Cli source code is available with Apache 2.0 license allowing distribution and commercial use. This contradicts the Claude Code, which is linked to Anthropic’s commercial license. This limits how it can be modified without express permission by the company.
The human also “ignores” the source code for the Claude code. In other words, Claude Code’s source code is not immediately available. When one The developer turned off the and released the source code in GitHub, Anthropic filed a DMCA complaint – A copyright notice that calls for the removal of the code.
Developers In the social media were not pleased With the movement, which they said they were adversely compared to the development of the Codex Cli by Openai. About the week from the release of Codex Cli, Openai has merged dozens of developer suggestions in the tool code, including one that allows Codex CLI Press AI models by rival providers – including anthropoid.
The man did not respond to a request for comments. To be fair in the lab, the Claude Code is still in Beta (and a little buggy); It is likely that the man will release the source code with a permissible license in the future. Companies have many reasons for the code, security estimates are one of them.
It is a somewhat stunning PR victory for Openai, which in recent months has avoided open source releases in favor of privately owned products. It can be emblematic of a broader shift in the laboratory approach. Openai Sam Altman’s chief executive earlier this year said he believed the company was on the “wrong side of history” when it comes to an open source.
